Revolve around the world of legal knowledge.

Daily News

Life Behind Bars: Tahir Hussain and Four Others Convicted for Brutal Killing of IB Officer Ankit Sharma in 2020 Delhi Riots

A Delhi court has sentenced former AAP councillor Tahir Hussain and four co-accused to life imprisonment for the 2020 murder of Intelligence Bureau staffer Ankit Sharma during the North-East Delhi riots. Judge Praveen Singh rejected the prosecution's demand for the death penalty, calling the killing brutal but not fitting the rarest-of-rare standard. Read Full Report More than five years after Intelligence Bureau staffer Ankit Sharma was killed during the 2020 North-East Delh

Courtroom Chaos: Law Students Who Hurled Abuses at CJI Walk Free on Bail, Court Issues Stern Warning

A Delhi court has granted bail to two Lucknow University law students arrested for disrupting Supreme Court proceedings on July 10. One of them had hurled abuses at the Chief Justice of India and thrown case papers in court, while allegedly using force against a security guard. Though granting relief, the magistrate strongly criticised their conduct, calling it unacceptable and undeserving of any leniency in tone. Read Full Report A Delhi court has released two law students o

Hot Talks

The Aggrieved Students Who Wouldn’t Go Home: Inside the NEET Paper Leak Protest

The youngsters were protesting, and finally, their biggest demand was met. On July 25, 2026, a Union Minister resigned — something few would have bet on a month earlier. But a resignation is rarely where a story ends; it’s usually where the next, harder chapter begins. Before we get to what’s still worth watching, here is the full, chronological story of how a leaked exam paper turned into a month that shook Delhi. Where It Started: The Exam and the Leak NEET-UG 2026 was held

Who Decides Guilt: The Court or the Bullet?

A Question We Don't Like to Ask Here’s a question that makes most people uncomfortable: if the police shoot a man dead before any court has heard his side, who exactly decided he was guilty? We’ve all grown up watching news anchors call it an “encounter” almost like it’s a good word — a clean word, a word that sounds like justice finally happened. A criminal was caught, shots were fired, and the criminal is now dead. End of story, right? Except it isn’t the end of the story.

At Peace, At Last: Time for Parliament to Act

Can a country that calls itself a constitutional democracy — one that has elevated dignity to the heart of its fundamental rights — force a man to keep living when life, as he once knew it, ended thirteen years ago? A Boy Who Fell, and a Family That Never Stopped Falling In August 2013, Harish Rana was nineteen years old. He was a student in Chandigarh — young, alive, full of whatever quiet ambitions nineteen-year-olds carry in their chests. Then one day, he fell from the f

Editor's Pick

So Close, Yet Three Years Away: The Judiciary's New Rulebook”

Imagine you're studying law for about five to six years, chasing one single dream — becoming a judge the day you graduate. Now imagine being told, almost overnight, that the dream must wait three more years. This is exactly what happened to thousands of law graduates across India when the Supreme Court decided that no one can become an entry-level judge without first practising as a lawyer for three years. What started as one court order has turned into one of the most talked

Sovereignty Is Non-Negotiable: The Urgent Need for a National Immigration Law

The Refugee Shield Has Become a Gateway for Illegal Immigration — and Ordinary Indians Are Paying the Price The Question Every Indian Deserves an Answer To Here is a straightforward question that rarely gets asked plainly enough. When an undocumented person from another country enters India without papers, acquires a fake Aadhaar card, registers on a voter list, settles into a city slum, and then — when caught — claims to be a refugee deserving international protection, what

Should Criminal Defamation Continue to Exist?

If someone damages your reputation with words, should they pay compensation—or should they face criminal prosecution? This is not a question reserved for courtrooms or law journals. It is a question that affects journalists reporting on the powerful, activists speaking truth to authority, ordinary citizens who raise complaints, and public figures trying to protect their dignity. It is a question about the kind of democracy we want to live in—and the kind of society we are bui